Service Tax: Analysis of Changes Applicable With Enactment of Finance Bill 2015

FINANCE BILL 2015 RECEIVED PRESIDENT ASSENT

Finance Bill, 2015 has got President Assent on 14th May, 2015 and has become Finance Act, 2015. As you know, Finance Bill 2015 has proposed lot of changes in Service tax provisions, applicable with effect from various dates.

Now with the enactment of Finance Bill, 2015, following changes have become applicable:

DEFINITIONS INTRODUCED / AMENDED

1. The Term “Government Defined: Services, excluding few specified services, provided by the government have been included in the Negative List. Further, specified services received by the government are also exempt. Hitherto, the term “government” has not been defined in the Act or the notification. This has given rise to interpretational issues. To address such issues, a definition of the term “government” is being incorporated in the Act.

Sub-section 26A inserted in section 65B in order to define the term Government. The term ‘Government’ defined to mean Central Government, State Government, Union territory and its departments. But it would not include entities whose accounts are not required to be kept under Article 150 of the Constitution.

2. Service Tax liability on Chit fund foremen and distributors or selling agents of lottery:

The intention in law has always been to levy Service Tax on the services provided by:

(i) chit fund foremen by way of conducting a chit.

(ii) distributors or selling agents of lottery, as appointed or authorized by the organizing state for promoting, marketing, distributing, selling, or assisting the state in any other way for organizing and conducting a lottery.

However, Courts have taken a contrary view in some cases, while in some cases the levy has been upheld.

Hence, in order to remove ambiguity, an explanation is being inserted in the definition of “service” to specifically state the intention of the legislature to levy service tax on activities undertaken by chit fund foremen in relation to chit, and distributors or selling agents of lottery in relation to lotteries.

CHANGES IN PRINCIPLES OF INTERPRETATION

3. Section 66F which deals with Principles of interpretation of specified description of services or bundled services. It prescribes that unless otherwise specified, reference to a service shall not include reference to any input service used for providing such service. An illustration is being incorporated in this section to exemplify the scope of this provision.

As illustrated, reference to service provided by RBI, in section 66D(b) does not include any agency service provided by other banks to RBI, as such agency services are input services used by RBI for provision of its main service. Accordingly, banks providing agency service to or in relation to services of RBI, are liable to pay Service Tax on the agency services so provided by virtue of the existing section 66F (1).

CHANGES IN VALUATION OF SERVICES

4. Section 67 : Valuation of Taxable Service: The definition of the term ‘consideration’ amended to include:

(a) all reimbursable expenditure or cost incurred and charged by the service provider subject to prescribed circumstances.

The intention has always been to include reimbursable expenditure in the value of taxable service. However, in some cases courts have taken a contrary view. Therefore, the intention of legislature is being stated specifically by this provision.

(b) amount retained by the distributor or selling agent of lottery from gross sale amount of lottery ticket, or, as the case may be, the discount received, that is the difference in the face value of lottery ticket and the price at which the distributor or selling agent gets such tickets.

PENAL PROVISIONS, RECOVERY OF TAX, APPEALS

5. Section 73 : Recovery of service tax not levied or paid or short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded: Section 73 is being amended in the following manner:

(i) a new sub-section (1B) is being inserted to provide that recovery of the service tax amount self-assessed and declared in the return but not paid shall be made under section 87, without service of any notice under sub-section (1) of section73,; and

(ii) sub-section (4A), that provides for reduced penalty if true and complete details of transaction were available on specified records, is being omitted.

Consequently, Rule 6 (6A) of Service Tax Rules which provided for recovery of service tax self-assessed and declared in the return under section 87 is being omitted due to the amendment in section 73 for enabling such recovery

6. Section 76: Penalty for failure to pay service tax: Section 76 is being amended to rationalize penalty, in cases not involving fraud or collusion or wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts or contravention of any provision of the Act or rules with the intent to evade payment of service tax, inthe following manner,-

(i) penalty not to exceed ten per cent of service tax amount involved in such cases;

(ii) no penalty is to be paid if service tax and interest is paid within 30 days of issuance of notice under section 73 (1);

(iii) a reduced penalty equal to 25% of the penalty imposed by the Central Excise officer by way of an order is to be paid if the service tax, interest and reduced penalty is paid within 30 days of such order; and

(iv) if the service tax amount gets reduced in any appellate proceeding, then penalty amount shall also stand modified accordingly, and benefit of reduced penalty ( 25% of penalty imposed) shall be admissible if service tax, interest and reduced penalty is paid within 30 days of such appellate order.

7. Section 78: Penalty for suppressing etc. : Section 78 is being amended to rationalize penalty, in cases involving fraud or collusion or wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts or contravention of any provision of the Act or rules with the intent to evade payment of service tax, in the following manner,-

(i) penalty shall be hundred per cent of service tax amount involved in such cases;

(ii) penalty equal to 15% of the service tax amount is to be paid if service tax, interest and reduced penalty is paid within 30 days of service of notice in this regard;

(iii) a reduced penalty equal to 25% of the service tax amount determined by the Central Excise Officer, by an order, is to be paid if the service tax, interest and reduced penalty is paid within 30 days of such order; and

(iv) if the service tax amount gets reduced in any appellate proceeding, then penalty amount shall also stand modified accordingly, and benefit of reduced penalty (25%) shall be admissible if service tax, interest and reduced penalty is paid within 30 days of such appellate order

8. New Section 78B : Transitory Provision: A new section 78 B is being inserted to prescribe, by way of a transition provision, that,-
* amended provisions of section 76 and 78 shall apply to cases where either no notice is served, or notice is served under sub-section (1) of section 73 or proviso thereto but no order has been issued under sub-section (2) of section 73, before the date of enactment of the Finance Bill, 2015; and
* in respect of cases covered by sub-section (4A) of section 73, if no notice is served, or notice is served under sub-section (1) of section 73 or proviso thereto but no order has been issued under sub-section (2) of section 73, before the date of enactment of the Finance Bill, 2015, penalty shall not exceed 50% of the service tax amount.

9. Section 80: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases: Section 80 provided for waiver of penalty in specified situations, is being omitted.

10. Section 86: Appeals to appellate tribunal: Section 86 is being amended to prescribe that matters involving rebate of service tax shall be dealt with in terms of Section35EE of the Central Excise Act.

11. Settlement Commission: Certain changes have been made in the provisions relating to Settlement Commission. These provisions, contained in the Central Excise Act, 1944, are made applicable to Service Tax, through section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994.

12. Rule 6 (6A) which provided for recovery of service tax self-assessed and declared in the return under section 87 is being omitted consequent to the amendment in section 73 for enabling such recovery.

SERVICE TAX : CHANGES TO BE APPLICABLE FROM THE DATE TO BE NOTIFIED AFTER THE ENACTMENT OF FINANCE BILL 2015

SERVICE TAX RATE

The rate of Service Tax is being increased from 12% plus Education Cesses to 14%. The ‘Education Cess’ and ‘Secondary and Higher Education Cess’ shall be subsumed in the revised rate of Service Tax. Thus, the effective increase in Service Tax rate will be from the existing rate of 12.36% (inclusive of cesses) to 14%, subsuming the cesses.

Service Tax Rate                    Earlier 12.36%                  New 14.00%

In respect of certain services like money changing service, service provided by air travel agent, insurance service and service provided by lottery distributor and selling agent the service provider has been allowed to pay service tax at an alternative rate subject to the conditions as prescribed under rule 6 (7), 6(7A), 6(7B) and 6(7C) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. Consequent to the upward revision in Service Tax rate, the said alternative rates shall also be revised proportionately. Amendments to this effect have been proposed in the Service Tax Rules. The new rates are summarized in the table below:




Services

Old Rate

New Rate

Air Travel Agent





Domestic booking

0.60%

0.70%

International booking

1.20%

1.40%

Life insurance 





First Year premium

3.00%

3.50%

Subsequent year premium

1.50%

1.75%

Money changing service 





Amount of currency upto 1 Lakh

0.12% subject to min Rs.30

0.14% subject to min Rs.35

Amount of currency exchanged exceeding INR 1 Lakh and upto 10 lakh

Rs.120 and 0.06%

Rs.140 and 0.07%

Amount of currency exchanged exceeding INR1 million

Rs.660 and 0.012% subject to max Rs.6,000

Rs.770 and 0.014% subject to max Rs.7,000

Lottery 





Where guaranteed prize payout is more than 80 per cent

Rs.7,000

Rs.8,200

Where guaranteed prize payout is less than 80 per cent

Rs.11,000

Rs.12,800


SWACHH BHARAT CESS

An enabling provision is being incorporated in the Finance Bill, 2014 to empower the Central Government to impose a Swachh Bharat Cess on all or any of the taxable services at a rate of 2% on the value of such taxable services. The cess shall be levied from the date to be notified after the enactment of the Finance Bill 2014.

CHANGES IN SECTION 66D OF NEGATIVE LIST

Entertainment Event or Amusement Facility

The Negative List entry that covers “admission to entertainment event or access to amusement facility” is being omitted [section 66D (j)]. Consequently, the definitions of “amusement facility” [section 65 B (9)] and “entertainment event” [section 65B(24)] are also being omitted. The implication of these changes are as follows,-
* Service Tax shall be levied on the service provided by way of access to amusement facility providing fun or recreation by means of rides, gaming devices or bowling alleys in amusement parks, amusement arcades, water parks and theme parks.
* Service tax to be levied on service by way of admission to entertainment event of concerts, pageants, musical performances concerts, award functions and sporting events other than the recognized sporting event, if the amount charged is more than Rs. 500 for right to admission to such an event. However, the existing exemption, by way of the Negative List entry, to service by way of admission to entertainment event, namely, exhibition of cinematographic film, circus, recognized sporting event, dance, theatrical performance including drama and ballet shall be continued, through the route of exemption. For this purpose a new entry is being inserted in notification No. 25/12-ST.

The term recognized sporting event has been defined in the proposed amendment in the said notification (No 6/2015 ST dated 1st March 2015).

Any Process Amounting to Manufacture or Production of goods

The entry in the Negative List that covers service by way of any process amounting to manufacture or production of goods [section 66D (f)] is being pruned to exclude any service by way of carrying out any processes for production or manufacture of alcoholic liquor for human consumption. Consequently, Service Tax shall be levied on contract manufacturing/job work for production of potable liquor for a consideration. In this context, the definition of the term “ process amounting to manufacture or production of goods” [section 65 B (40)] is also being amended, along with the Negative List entry [section 66D (f)], with a consequential amendment in S. No. 30 of notification No. 25/12-ST, to exclude intermediate production of alcoholic liquor for human consumption from its ambit.

Support Services by Government to Business Entities

Presently, services provided by Government or a local authority, excluding certain services specified under clause (a) of section 66D, are covered by the Negative List. Service Tax applies on the “support service” provided by the Government or local authority to a business entity. An enabling provision is being made, by amending section 66D (a)(iv), to exclude all services provided by the Government or local authority to a business entity from the Negative List. Consequently, the definition of “support service” [section 65 B (49)] is being omitted. Accordingly, as and when this amendment is given effect to, all services provided by the Government or local authority to a business entity, except the services that are specifically exempted, or covered by any another entry in the Negative List, shall be liable to service tax.

(Author – CA. Chitresh Gupta, B.Com(H), FCA, IFRS (Certified), IDT (Certified) is Author of Book “An Insight Into Goods & Service Tax” and also Managing Partner at M/s Chitresh Gupta & Associates)



Finance Bill 2015 approved by President of India wef 14.05.2015

MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE
(Legislative Department)

THE FINANCE ACT, 2015
NO. 20 OF 2015
[14th May, 2015.]

An Act to give effect to the financial proposals of the Central Government for the financial year 2015-2016.

The following Act of Parliament received the assent of the President on the 14th May, 2015, and is hereby published for general information:— 


जीएसटी से जुड़े हर सवाल का जवाब

GST टैक्स सुधार के लिए क्रांतिकारी कदम माना जा रहा जीएसटी देश के हर नागरिक को प्रभावित करने वाला है। जानिए जीएसटी से जुड़े हर सवाल का जवाब।

सवालः क्या है जीएसटी?

जवाबः जीएसटी का पूरा नाम है गुड्स एंड सर्विस टैक्स। ये एक अप्रत्यक्ष कर है यानी ऐसा कर जो सीधे-सीधे ग्राहकों से नहीं वसूला जाता लेकिन जिसकी कीमत अंत में ग्राहक की जेब से ही जाती है। अप्रैल 2016 यानी अगले वित्तीय वर्ष से जीएसटी को लागू होना है। इसे आजादी के बाद सबसे बड़ा टैक्स सुधार कदम कहा जा रहा है। जीएसटी लागू होने के बाद दूसरे कई तरह के टैक्स समाप्त हो जाएंगे और उसकी जगह सिर्फ जीएसटी लगेगा।

सवालः जीएसटी कौन-कौन से टैक्स खत्म करेगा?

जवाबः जीएसटी लागू होने के बाद सेंट्रल एक्साइज ड्यूटी, एडीशनल एक्साइज ड्यूटी, सर्विस टैक्स, एडीशनल कस्टम ड्यूटी (सीवीडी), स्पेशल एडिशनल ड्यूटी ऑफ कस्टम (एसएडी), वैट/सेल्स टैक्स, सेंट्रल सेल्स टैक्स, मनोरंजन टैक्स, ऑक्ट्रॉय एंडी एंट्री टैक्स, परचेज टैक्स, लक्जरी टैक्स खत्म हो जाएंगे।

सवालः तो क्या जीएसटी में कोई टैक्स नहीं लगेगा?

जवाबः जीएसटी लागू होने के बाद वस्तुओं एवं सेवाओं पर केवल तीन टैक्स वसूले जाएंगे पहला सीजीएसटी यानी सेंट्रल जीएसटी जो केंद्र सरकार वसूलेगी। दूसरा एसजीएसटी यानी स्टेट जीएसटी जो राज्य सरकार अपने यहां होने वाले कारोबार पर वसूलेगी। कोई कारोबार अगर दो राज्यों के बीच होगा तो उस पर आईजीएसटी यानी इंटीग्रेटेड जीएसटी वसूला जाएगा। इसे केंद्र सरकार वसूल करेगी और उसे दोनों राज्यों में समान अनुपात में बांट दिया जएगा।

सवालः जीएसटी के क्या फायदा होगा?

जवाबः आज एक ही चीज अलग-अलग राज्य में अलग-अलग दाम पर बिकती है। इसकी वजह है कि अलग-अलग राज्यों में उसपर लगने वाले टैक्सों की संख्या और दर अलग-अलग होती है। अब ये नहीं होगा। हर चीज पर जहां उसका निर्माण हो रहा है, वहीं जीएसटी वसूल लिया जाएगा और उसके बाद उसके लिए आगे कोई चुंगी पर, बिक्री पर या अन्य कोई टैक्स नहीं देना पड़ेगा। इससे पूरे देश में वो चीज एक ही दाम पर मिलेगी। कई राज्यों में टैक्स की दर बहुत ज्यादा है। ऐसे राज्यों में वो चीजें सस्ती होंगी।

सवालः क्या पेट्रोल और शराब पर भी लागू होगा फैसला?

जवाबः पेट्रोल-डीजल की कीमतें आज अलग-अलग राज्यों में अलग-अलग हैं। यही हाल शराब का है। जीएसटी लागू होने के बाद भी फिलहाल ऐसा जारी रहेगा। क्योंकि राज्यों की डिमांड पर केंद्र सरकार शराब को जीएसटी से बाहर रखने पर राजी हो गई है जबकि पेट्रो पदार्थों पर उसने निर्णय लिया है कि ये रहेंगे तो जीएसटी के अंदर लेकिन इनपर राज्य पहले की तरह ही टैक्स वसूलते रहेंगे। यानी पेट्रोल, डीजल और एलपीजी सिलेंडर की कीमतों में राज्यों में जो अंतर देखने को मिलता है वो मिलता रहेगा।

सवालः जीएसटी पर राज्यों के हाथ से तमाम टैक्स फिसलेंगे उनकी टैक्स भरपाई कौन करेगा?

जवाबः जीएसटी लागू होने से केंद्र सरकार, कारोबारी, दुकानदार व उपभोक्ता सबको तकरीबन फायदा होगा। हालांकि राज्यों को इससे कुछ नुकसान झेलना पड़ सकता है लेकिन उनको जितना नुकसान होगा तीन साल तक उसकी भरपाई केंद्र सरकार करेगी। चौथे साल 75 फीसदी और पांचवें साल 50 फीसदी नुकसान की भरपाई केंद्र सरकार करेगी। केंद्र सरकार राज्यों को भरपाई की गारंटी देने के लिए इसके लिए संविधान में भी व्यवस्था करने पर भी तैयार हो गई है।

सवालः जीएसटी से सरकार को क्या फायदा होगा?

जवाबः जीएसटी लागू होने के बाद देश की जीडीपी ग्रोथ में तकरीबन दो फीसदी तक का उछाल आने का अनुमान है। ऐसा इसलिए होगा क्योंकि टैक्स की चोरी रुकेगी क्योंकि अभी टैक्स कई स्तरों पर वसूला जाता है इससे हेराफेरी की, धांधली की गुजाइश ज्यादा रहती है। जीएसटी के चलते टैक्स जमा करना जब सुविधापूर्ण और आसान होगा तो ज्यादा से ज्यादा कारोबारी टैक्स भरने में रुचि दिखाएंगे। इससे सरकार की आय बढ़ेगी। व्यापारियों को भी जब अलग-अलग टैक्सों के झंझट से मुक्ति मिलेगी तो वे भी अपना व्यापार सही से कर पाएंगे। टैक्स को लेकर विवाद भी कम होंगे। अर्थव्यवस्था को गति मिलेगी।

सवालः कैसे वसूला जाएगा जीएसटी?

जवाबः जीएसटी की वसूली ऑनलाइन होगी। वस्तु के मैनुफैक्चरिंग के स्तर पर ही इसे वसूल लिया जाएगा। किसी वस्तु का टैक्स जमा होते ही जीएसटी के सभी सेंटरों पर इस बाबत जानकारी पहुंच जाएगी। उसके बाद उस वस्तु पर आपूर्तिकर्ता, दुकानदार या ग्राहक को आगे कोई टैक्स नहीं देना होगा। अगर माल एक राज्य से दूसरे राज्य जा रहा है तो उसपर चुंगी भी नहीं लगेगा। यानी बॉर्डर पर ट्रकों की जो लंबी कतारें अभी दिखती हैं वे गायब हो जाएंगी।

सवालः जीएसटी की दर कौन तय करेगा?

जवाबः जीएसटी संबंधित फैसले लेने के लिए संवैधानिक संस्था जीएसटी काउंसिल का गठन किया जाएगा। जीएसटी काउंसिल में केंद्र व राज्य दोनों के प्रतिनिधि होंगे। इसके मुखिया केंद्रीय वित्त मंत्री होंगे जबकि राज्यों के वित्त मंत्री सदस्य होंगे। जीएसटी काउंसिल जीएसटी की दर, टैक्स में छूट, टैक्स विवाद, टैक्स दायरे व अन्य व्यवस्थाओं पर सिफारिशें देगी।

सवालः जीएसटी इतना फायदेमंद तो अब तक क्यों अटका हुआ था?

जवाबः जीएसटी को लेकर राज्य सरकारें नुकसान की भरपाई पर अड़ी थीं और तमाम कोशिशों के बावजूद इसका कोई सर्वमान्य फॉर्मूला नहीं निकाला जा सका। अब सरकार ने राज्यों को नुकसान भरपाई का जो फॉर्मूला सुझाया है उसपर राज्यों ने सहमति दी है। केंद्र में मजबूत सरकार और तमाम राज्यों में बीजेपी की सरकार आने से भी स्थिति आसान हुई है।

CBI Arrests an Inspector of Central Excise In a Bribery Case


CBI ARRESTS AN INSPECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE IN A BRIBERY CASE

Press Release- New Delhi, 07.05.2015

The Central Bureau of Investigation has arrested an Inspector of Central Excise, Roorkee (Uttrakhand) for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.3,500/- from the Complainant.

A case was registered under section 7 of PC Act, 1988 against an Inspector of Central Excise, Roorkee on a complaint. It was alleged that the Inspector was demanding a sum of Rs.3,500/- from the Complainant for registration of his firm with Service Tax Department of Central Excise. CBI laid a trap and the Inspector was arrested in his office while demanding & accepting a bribe of Rs.3,500/- from the Complainant.

The arrested accused was produced today in the Court of Special Judge, CBI Cases, Dehradun and remanded to Judicial Custody.

Tax Planning - Income From House Property

F.A.Q. on Income from House Property

Q1. How is income to be computed, if a property is partly let out and partly self-occupied?Answer. It has to be treated as two residential units and income from each unit has to be computed according to law by allocating common outgoings on a basis proportionate to area of occupation.

Q2. Is it necessary that the person must be a legal owner in order that the income should be computed under the head “income from property”?Answer. No. If a person is entitled to the income under the law, such income is bound to be assessed under the head “income from property”. Tax laws are generally concerned with beneficial ownership as laid down in CIT vs. Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd.

Q.3. Is municipal tax deductible in computation of income from: (i) self-occupied property; and (ii) where demand notice is reserved but it has not been paid?Answer. Since income from one self-occupied property is nil, subject only to deduction of interest the question of deduction of municipal tax does not arise. For let out proper-ties, municipal tax is deductible only if it is paid during the year.

Q.4. Is deduction for repairs available, when tenant undertakes repairs under the rental agreement? What is meant by repairs?Answer. By repairs we mean only substantial repairs as held in CIT vs. Parbutty Churn Law 1965 57 ITR 609 Cal and Sir Shadi Lai & Sons vs. CIT. Where even substantial repairs other than normal maintenance is undertaken by tenant, annual value should get enhanced by the extent of repairs which should have been borne by the landlord so that any deduction for repairs then available to landlord will neutralise the amount added to annual rent. It would, therefore, mean that where there is specific stipulation that all repairs will be borne by tenant, there can be no deduction for repairs.

Q5. Is an annual charge on rent receivable on account of mortgage of property for obtaining funds for business or paying income tax deductible under section 24(1)(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?Answer. No. Since it is a charge created voluntarily by the assessee, it is not deductible as was held in CIT vs. Indramani Devi Singhania in case of a business loan and CIT vs. Tarachand Kalyanji in the case of a charge created for payment of excess profit tax In the latter case, it was held that the amount is not deductible even if the charge has been created before 1st April, 1969, when such amount was deductible in law.

Q6. What are the conditions for deduction of unrealised rent?Answer. Rule 4 of the Income-tax Rules as substituted by the Income-tax (Eighth Amendment) Rules, 2001 prescribes the conditions as under:

Unrealised rent—For the purposes of the Explanation below sub-section (1) of section 23, the amount of rent which the owner cannot realise shall be equal to the amount of rent payable but not paid by a tenant of the assessee and so proved to be lost and irrecoverable where,—
(a) the tenancy is bona fide;
(b) the defaulting tenant has vacated, or steps have been taken to compel him to vacate the property;
(c) the defaulting tenant is not in occupation of any other property of the assessee;
(d) the assessee has taken all reasonable steps to institute legal proceedings for the recovery of the unpaid rent or satisfies the Assessing Officer that legal proceedings would be useless.

Q7. Is salary paid to a caretaker deductible?Answer. No. Only deductions specified under section 24 are deductible.

Q8. How is the income of co-owned property computed?Answer. Income has to be split up between co-owners and each co-owner has to be assessed as his share of the income as provided under section 26 of the Act.

Q9. Where an assessee borrows a second loan for repaying the first loan taken for acquiring a property, will the interest on second loan be deductible as amount borrowed for acquiring the property?Answer. Yes. It is so conceded in Board’s Circular No. 28 dated 20th August, 1969.

Q10. Ground rent—whether arrears of earlier years deductible?Answer. No. The deduction under section 24(1 )(v) is confined to the ground rent of previous year, and thus arrears of earlier years are not deductible. Ground rent is no longer deductible from A.Y.2002-2003.

Q11. Interest deductible under section 24(1 )(vi): whether simple interest or compound Interest?Answer. Only simple interest is deductible.

Q12. What is the treatment given to loss from property?Answer. Loss from property can be set off against other heads of income in the same year and to the extent unabsorbed, it will be carried forward and set off in next eight years.

Q13. Where municipal valuation is higher than the rent charged, what is the basis of computation of property income?Answer. The law requires that either annual value as fixed by the local authorities or actual rent received, whichever is higher, should be treated as annual value. But where the assessee is unable to enhance the rent due to Rent Control Act, there is a case for acceptance of rent receivable as the basis. It was so held in CIT vs. Sampathammal Chordia 2000 245 ITR 290 Mad.

Q14. Are municipal taxes allowed on the basis of tax leviable for a year or on the basis of payment? If it is on the basis of what is leviable, what happens if demand for earlier years is received only during the year with the result that the payments for earlier years are made during the year?Answer. Section 23(1) allows property tax levied by local authority on the basis of payment from assessment year 1985-86 vide amendment by Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984 so that the controversy in the prior law is now avoided. So, the amount paid during the year, including any amount of arrears for earlier years, is deductible in the year of payment.

Q15. Where the assessee is a mutual association having a property, will the property income be covered by the principle of mutuality so as to be exempt?Answer. Yes, it has been held that principle of mutuality applies even to income from house property in Chelmsford Club vs. CIT (2000) 243 ITR 89 (SC).

Q16. The assessee — Mrs. A is in enjoyment of the property but the right is limited only for life under a Will in her favour. Who has to pay the tax, whether she as the person in enjoyment of the property as the holder of life interest or the remainderman treated as the owner in law?Answer. Ownership is a bundle of rights. Right to enjoy the property is also a right which is part of such ownership right. Hence it will be assessable in the hands of life interest owner. It has been so held in Estate of Ambalal Sarabhai vs. CIT 2000 245 ITR 445 Guj.


Q17. Where an assessee receives interest on deposit taken from a tenant, is it necessary to enhance the annual value by the notional interest which would have otherwise been payable?Answer. Where actual rent received is more than the fair rent, i.e., annual value fixed by the local authorities, notional interest need not be added. It was so held in CIT vs. J.K. Investors (Bombay) Ltd. 2001) 167 CTR (Mad) 163. Where such notional interest is to be taken, as for example, where no rent is charged because of such interest free deposit, the interest or other income earned by deployment of the interest free deposit will have to be correspondingly reduced from the annual value but the law does not provide for the same.

But it stands to reason that such reduction may have to be allowed, though it is doubtful whether such reasonable interpretation will be acceptable to revenue.

Q18. Is it open to the Assessing Officer to substitute reasonable rent where the property is let out to an associate company at a lower rate?Answer. Since annual value is not the only criterion, it is open to the Assessing Officer to adopt a reasonable rate where it is let out at a concessional rate. It was so held in T. V. Sundaram Iyengar & Sons Ltd. vs. CIT.

Q19. Where the property is in existence for less than 12 months, is it possible to assess the income as income from property since the scheme of the Act is to assess the annual rent? Does the income escape assessment in such cases?Answer. The argument that the property should have been held for entire 12 months to be assessable under the head ‘Income from property’ was accepted in P.J. Eapen vs. CIT. But it was held that such income will be assessable under ‘Other sources’. The decision is open to doubt because there is no reason why the proportionate income should not be assessed with reference to the period of holding because such proportionality is recognised in section 23 where the property is let out for part of the year and used for own residence for rest of the year under section 23(2)(a)(ii). Hence, similar apportionment should be possible though the annual value is with reference to the income which the property might fetch if let out from year to year.

Q20. Where the deduction under section 24 exceeds the available income, can such excess be allowable?Answer. Where the property is partly let out and partly used for own residence, the deduction under section 24(1) will be limited to the income determined under that clause under the substituted section 24 by Finance Act, 2001. with effect from 1.4.2002, there are no detailed deductions but only 30% of annual value and interest on borrowed capital subject to the limit of ` 30,000 for self-occupied property with enhanced limit up to `2.00 lakhs subject to conditions as to the date of the loan and the date of construction. Hence, there can be a loss from the property depending upon interest on borrowed capital. It is only in respect of annual value, that there cannot be loss.

Q21. There is a practice of receiving deposit instead of rent. The assessee accounts for interest on such deposits as its income. Should he also account for notional income from property?Answer. The answer was against the assessee in S.Ujjanappa vs. CIT, where it was held that ownership confers the duty to account for notional income from such property. The issue as to whether it involves double taxation was not posed in this case. Interest income earned by the assessee on the deposits or notional interest when used in business could have been set off against such income. There is clearly double taxation implicit in such cases. In Webb’s Agricultural & Automobile Industries vs. ITO , a car received by way of lottery winnings brought to tax as income was held to be eligible for depreciation, though assessee had not paid for the same, because of the notional cost. This line of reasoning should avoid elimination of double taxation by setting off the two incomes one notional and the other real as between them, but the law on the subject is still nebulous.

Q22. Is the amount of interest paid on unpaid consideration for acquiring property deductible as interest on borrowing under section 24(1 )(vi) of the Income-tax Act?Answer. In the context of similar interest on unpaid consideration for acquiring a business; the Supreme Court had held in Bombay Steam Navigation Co. (1953) P. Ltd. vs. CIT that such interest is not deductible under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. But in the same case, it was found that it can be allowed as deduction under section 37 of the Act. It is for this reason that it has felt that in absence of similar residuary clause, interest on unpaid consideration for acquiring property would not be deductible.

However it was found in CIT vs. Sunil Kumar Sharma following CIT vs. R.P. Goenka and J.P. Goenka that it makes no difference, whether the buyer borrows from a third party to acquire a property or gets the necessary financial assistance from the seller of the property. It should be construed that the seller is the lender and the purchaser is the borrower. It would thus appear that such interest is deductible.

Q23. What is the change in respect of computation of property income by the Finance Act, 2005?Answer. There is no change in computation of property income, but the incentive for re-payment of loan for acquiring a property is enlarged by removing the limit of Rs. 20,000 in respect of such repayment and by providing such repayment as an outright deduction from the gross total income by the new section 80C substituting section 88, subject, however, to the limit of total deduction under section 80C to Rs. 1.50 lakh. Interest payable on such loan would be admissible as deduction, if the property were let out, subject to limit of Rs. 30,000 in case of self- occupation.

Q24. If a person puts up a property on leased land, is the lease rent deductible as income from property?Answer. There is no special provision for deduction of lease rent as was available in the pre-existing law under section 24 either as an annual charge on the property or as ground rent, but all the same, what is payable on leased land gets diverted at source and should not be part of the annual value, so that in determination of annual value, the amount should be deductible. Any other view could not be reasonable. An alternative argument may well be that if it is not deductible, income itself may not be assessable as a property income as the assessee is not the full owner of the property, so that income will be assessable as from “Other sources”, so that the deduction in such a case cannot be denied, though the assessee may not be eligible for an ad hoc deduction at 30%; but only actual repairs, where it is assessable as income from other sources.

Q25. Where a landlord undertakes to meet the expenses of watch and ward, corridor, lighting, lift, etc., are such expenses deductible from property income?
Answer. Expenses which are ordinarily borne by the tenant, but undertaken by the landlord according to terms of rental agreement will go to reduce the annual value, because the rental value of the property can only be the net income after meeting the tenant’s burden.

Q26. Where the assessee allows the property to be used by firm of which he is a partner without charging rent, is he entitled to self-occupation allowance or depreciation?Answer. Since the firm is not a separate legal entity, the use of property by the firm should be treated as use and occupation of the property by the partner itself, so that self-occupation benefit will be available from income from such property. If the property is used for business, there is eligibility for depreciation also.

Q27. Where a partner allows the use of the property by the firm and charges rent for the same, would he be entitled to ad hoc deduction at 30% or depreciation of the property because of the use for business?Answer. Since the rent is received from a firm of which he is a partner, the amount of rent receivable may not be treated as received in his capacity as landlord, but as a partner. If the property is used for business, the owner should be entitled to depreciation. It was so held in CIT vs. Ramlubhaiya R. Malhotra following A.M. Ponnuranga Mudaliar vs. CIT. The latter decision was followed in CIT vs. Texspin Engineering and Manufacturing Works.

Q28. In the case where a tenant sublets the property, is the rent paid by the tenant deductible from the income from subletting?Answer. Since the tenant is not the owner, the income should ordinarily be assessable as income from other sources, so that the rent paid should be deductible. Even if it were lease- hold property, the rent paid may have to be taken into account in determining the annual value. Contrary view taken in CIT Hemraj Mahabir Prasad Ltd. would need review.

Q.29. Where the assessee borrows money on mortgage of his property for his daughter’s marriage, is such interest paid deductible from the property income?
Answer. Merely because the loan is charged on the property, interest does not become deductible, because the amount is not borrowed for purpose of acquiring or constructing the property.
Source Online Article

Reasons Why PAN Card is Important in India


Importance of PAN Card in IndiaPAN card i.e. permanent account number is provided by Income tax department to every income tax payer. But do you know that PAN card is compulsory and required by following authorities while doing financial transactions with them:

While opening a new bank account
It is must to produce a photocopy of PAN card while applying for a new bank account be it public / private / co-operative or other banks. However in the recently started financial inclusion program – Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), PAN card was not required by participating banks. Check out PMJDY benefits.

Applying for credit or debit card
Quoting your PAN is must when applying for debit or credit card. Not submitting this will straight away result in application getting rejected. Credit card application rejection can cause problem in getting loan, credit card etc. in future and impact your credit score.

Insurance payment
CBDT has mandated insurance policy holder to furnish PAN details while making any premium payment to insurance companies for amount exceeding Rs. 50,000 in an year.

Purchase or sell of vehicle
If you are are planning to buy or sell vehicle whose cost is greater than Rs. 5,00,000 then submitting a copy of PAN card is compulsory.

Buying or selling property (immovable asset)
Any property transaction for amount exceeding Rs. 5 Lacs requires this number to be mentioned in the property document. Buying or selling is impossible if you do not have this. In case, it is a joint property then PAN details of each person is required.

Jewellery purchase
High value jewellery purchase for amount greater than Rs.5,00,000 (5 Lacs) requires buyer to provide PAN number.

Fixed or cash deposit
Opening a fixed deposit account or cash deposit for amount greater than Rs. 50,000 at any bank requires the permanent account number. Failure to submit the same would result in TDS getting deducted at 20% if the interest amount of FD account exceeds Rs. 10,000 which is higher than the current 10%.

New telephone connection
All telecom companies have been mandated by Government of India to get PAN details of each applicant for normal or cellular connection to keep a tab on terrorism, extortion charges etc.

Investing in securities
Transactions exceeding Rs. 50,000 for equities/mutual fund/debentures/bonds requires investor’s PAN card.

Opening account at broker
For trading in share market, you need to open account with a share broker for which submitting PAN details is mandatory. Failure to provide this will result in rejection of your application.

There our several other reasons for which PAN Card is important, which might not be discussed above.

Article source allonmoney.com

PAN Card - Is it so Important in India ?


PAN, or Permanent Account Number, is a unique 10-digit alphanumeric identity allotted to each taxpayer by the Income Tax Department under the supervision of the Central Board of Direct Taxes. It also serves as an identity proof. PAN is mandatory for financial transactions such as receiving taxable salary or professional fees, sale or purchase of assets above specified limits, buy mutual funds and more.

The primary objective of PAN is to use a universal identification key to track financial transactions that might have a taxable component to prevent tax evasion. The PAN number remains unaffected by change of address throughout India.

WHO MUST APPLY FOR PAN?* Anybody who earns a taxable income in India, including foreign nationals who pay taxes here
* Anybody who runs a business (be it retail, services or consultancy) that had total sales, turnover or gross receipt exceeding Rs 5 lakh in the previous financial year

HOW TO APPLY?Use 'Form 49A' or 'Form 49AA' as applicable to you. Find more details at www.incometaxindia.gov.in
You can find the location of PAN card offices in any city from the websites of the Income Tax Department or National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) https://www.tin-nsdl.com/tin-facilities.php.
You will need copies of proof of Identity and address.
Payment can be made using cash, cheque or demand draft.
You can also apply online through websites of the I-T Department or NSDL.
If you are applying online, the processing fee can be paid via net banking, credit card or debit card.
After applying, track the status of your application online https://tin.tin.nsdl.com/tan/servlet/PanStatusTrack

WHY GET A PAN NUMBER?For payment of direct taxes
To file income tax returns
To avoid deduction of tax at higher rate than due
To enter into specific transaction such as:
(a) Sale or purchase of immovable property valued at Rs 5 lakh or more
(b) Sale or purchase of a vehicle other than a two wheeler
(c) Payment to hotels or restaurants an amount exceeding Rs 25,000 at any one time
(d) Payment in cash an amount exceeding Rs 25,000 in connection with travel to any foreign country
(e) Payment of an amount of Rs 50,000 or more to the Reserve Bank of India for acquiring bonds
(f) Payment of an amount of Rs 50,000 or more to a company or an institution for acquiring bonds or debentures
(g) Payment of an amount of Rs 50,000 or more to a company for acquiring shares
(h) Any mutual fund purchase
(j) Deposit exceeding Rs 50,000 with any single banking institution in 24 hours.
(k) Payment exceeding Rs 5 lakh for purchase of bullion and jewellery

Article source online